Startseite  >  Welthandel  >  WTO

Statement from an International Hearing on the WTO Agriculture Agreement

On the eve of a crucial discussion on the world agricultural trade system, civil society groups from 30 countries gathered in Geneva to take stock of the WTO negotiations on a new Agriculture Agreement. The discussion centred on the draft text issued on 17 February by Stuart Harbinson, Chair of the Agriculture Committee.

Participants at the hearing rejected the current Harbinson draft modalities text as an acceptable basis for negotiations. Why?

What participants heard from a number of agricultural negotiators, from both developed and developing countries, convinced them that the agriculture negotiations are still business as usual: the outcome determined by horse trading based on economic and political clout.

We the undersigned call on our governments to reject the current Harbinson draft modalities as an acceptable basis for negotiations. Instead, they should work to create new trade rules that:

Geneva, February 21, 2003

Signatories:

  1. Comhlamn, Ireland
  2. Friends of the Earth Europe
  3. Third World Network, Malaysia
  4. Consumers' Association of Penang, Malaysia
  5. Friends of the Earth, Malaysia
  6. RODI-Kenya (FATNEA)
  7. Kerkinactie, Netherlands
  8. Oxfam International
  9. ActionAid UK
  10. IBON, Philippines
  11. Action for Economic Reforms, Philippines
  12. Task Force Food Sovereignty, Philippines
  13. IRDF, Philippines
  14. Asia-Pacific Network on Food Sovereignty, Philippines
  15. Social Watch, Philippines
  16. SEATINI, Zimbabwe
  17. Asia Gender and Trade Network
  18. ROPPA (West African Peasants' Network)
  19. CAFOD, UK
  20. PARC, Palestine
  21. Danchurchaid, Denmark
  22. NGO Coordinating Committee on Development, Thailand
  23. Swadeshi Jagran Manch, India
  24. Bhartia Kisan Sungh, India
  25. Simalungun Protestant Christian Church (GKPs), Indonesia
  26. Institute of World Economics and Politics
  27. Parto Tekerani-Kronner, Germany
  28. Broederlijk Delen, Belgium
  29. EED, Germany
  30. Institute for Global Justice, Indonesia
  31. SCIAF, Scotland
  32. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, USA
  33. Center of Concern/ US Gender and Trade Network, USA
  34. CIDSE, Belgium
  35. RMALC, Mexico
  36. Canadian Foodgrains Bank, Canada
  37. CIOEC, Bolivia
  38. Germanwatch, Germany
  39. Anglican Church of Kenya
  40. International Centre on Trade and Sustainable Development, Switzerland
  41. AMIHAN, Philippines
  42. Southeast Asian Council for Food Security and Fair Trade (SEA Council), Malaysia
  43. APRODEV, Belgium
  44. Justice and Peace Coalition, World Council of Churches
  45. Ecumenical Advocacy Alliance, Switzerland
  46. Michael Starck, Germany
  47. J.C. Michellod, Switzerland
  48. Luk Tak Chuen, Hong Kong China
  49. Agricultural Christian Fellowship, UK
  50. Michelle Cano, Germany

last updated 25.2.03