Startseite
> Welthandel > WTO
Statement from an International Hearing
on the WTO Agriculture Agreement
On the eve of a crucial discussion on
the world agricultural trade system, civil society groups from 30 countries
gathered in Geneva to take stock of the WTO negotiations on a new Agriculture
Agreement. The discussion centred on the draft text issued on 17 February
by Stuart Harbinson, Chair of the Agriculture Committee.
Participants at the hearing rejected
the current Harbinson draft modalities text as an acceptable basis for
negotiations. Why?
-
It reveals the emptiness of the Doha
Ministerial Declaration's stated intention of placing development, food
security and rural livelihoods at the heart of the Doha Round.
-
It does not change the underlying structure
of the AoA, which has caused widespread hardship for farmers around the
world and discourages sustainable models of agriculture.
-
Developing countries face a world in
which developed countries, particularly the European Union and United States,
continue to dump underpriced exports on world markets. Dumping artificially
lowers world prices, destroying local food production and farmers' livelihoods.
-
The current structure of the Agreement
and the Harbinson text both legalise dumping, at the same time as they
erode developing countries' only defence against dumping - tariffs and
other border measures.
-
It fails to recognize the central role
played by women in food production and the nutritional well-being of the
family and community, as well as the particular impact of trade liberalization
on women.
-
It ignores the increasing stranglehold
exerted on agricultural trade by a small number of transnational corporations,
which in turn depresses farmgate prices around the world.
-
The AoA continues to be driven by a
'you liberalize, we subsidize' approach from the EU and US, as shown by
the US farm bill and the glacial pace of CAP reform.
-
It conflicts with countries' commitments
under the UN Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural rights, and in particular
the right to food.
What participants heard from a number
of agricultural negotiators, from both developed and developing countries,
convinced them that the agriculture negotiations are still business as
usual: the outcome determined by horse trading based on economic and political
clout.
We the undersigned call on our governments
to reject the current Harbinson draft modalities as an acceptable basis
for negotiations. Instead, they should work to create new trade rules that:
-
Address the real source of distortions
in world agricultural markets - the monopolistic power of global agri-business
-
Take food security and food sovereignty
fully into account, in particular in allowing developing countries to protect
their poor farmers against low world prices and to recognize the special
cultural role of food in many communities.
-
Allow countries to introduce import
controls and tariffs on dumped agricultural products
-
Act on governments' multilateral commitment
to increase employment by promoting rural livelihoods. In particular, taking
into account the needs of vulnerable groups and women, who produce the
majority of the world's food.
-
Rectify the imbalances between rich
and poor countries in agricultural trade
Geneva, February 21, 2003
Signatories:
-
Comhlamn, Ireland
-
Friends of the Earth Europe
-
Third World Network, Malaysia
-
Consumers' Association of Penang, Malaysia
-
Friends of the Earth, Malaysia
-
RODI-Kenya (FATNEA)
-
Kerkinactie, Netherlands
-
Oxfam International
-
ActionAid UK
-
IBON, Philippines
-
Action for Economic Reforms, Philippines
-
Task Force Food Sovereignty, Philippines
-
IRDF, Philippines
-
Asia-Pacific Network on Food Sovereignty,
Philippines
-
Social Watch, Philippines
-
SEATINI, Zimbabwe
-
Asia Gender and Trade Network
-
ROPPA (West African Peasants' Network)
-
CAFOD, UK
-
PARC, Palestine
-
Danchurchaid, Denmark
-
NGO Coordinating Committee on Development,
Thailand
-
Swadeshi Jagran Manch, India
-
Bhartia Kisan Sungh, India
-
Simalungun Protestant Christian Church
(GKPs), Indonesia
-
Institute of World Economics and Politics
-
Parto Tekerani-Kronner, Germany
-
Broederlijk Delen, Belgium
-
EED, Germany
-
Institute for Global Justice, Indonesia
-
SCIAF, Scotland
-
Institute for Agriculture and Trade
Policy, USA
-
Center of Concern/ US Gender and Trade
Network, USA
-
CIDSE, Belgium
-
RMALC, Mexico
-
Canadian Foodgrains Bank, Canada
-
CIOEC, Bolivia
-
Germanwatch, Germany
-
Anglican Church of Kenya
-
International Centre on Trade and Sustainable
Development, Switzerland
-
AMIHAN, Philippines
-
Southeast Asian Council for Food Security
and Fair Trade (SEA Council), Malaysia
-
APRODEV, Belgium
-
Justice and Peace Coalition, World Council
of Churches
-
Ecumenical Advocacy Alliance, Switzerland
-
Michael Starck, Germany
-
J.C. Michellod, Switzerland
-
Luk Tak Chuen, Hong Kong China
-
Agricultural Christian Fellowship, UK
-
Michelle Cano, Germany
last updated 25.2.03