Offener Brief: Es braucht einen mutigen und transformativen Klimasozialfonds - jetzt mehr denn je!

Derzeit wird auf EU-Ebene über eine Reform des Emissionshandelssystems (EHS) diskutiert. Dies beinhaltet die von der Europäischen Kommission vorgeschlagene Ausweitung der CO2-Bepreisung auf die Sektoren Straßenverkehr und Gebäudewärme sowie die ergänzende Einführung eines Klimasozialfonds zum sozialen Ausgleich. In einem offenen Brief fordert Germanwatch gemeinsam mit 37 weiteren Organisationen, das neue EHS nicht als weitere Belastung für Europäer:innen zu sehen, sondern als effektive Antwort auf die Energie- und Klimakrise. Dafür müsse es so bald wie möglich durch einen starken Klimasozialfonds flankiert werden, der sich durch ein großzügiges und am CO2-Preis ausgerichtetes Budget auszeichnet. Um den geforderten Minimalumfang von 72,2 Mrd. Euro zu erreichen, solle u.a. die Verwendung von Einnahmen aus dem bereits bestehenden EHS und der Übergewinnabschöpfung im Stromsektor sowie eine Kofinanzierung durch die Mitgliedsstaaten umgesetzt werden.

Open letter:

A bold and transformative Social Climate Fund is needed, now
more than ever

Dear Czech Presidency of the Council of the European Union,
Dear Ms Esther de Lange MEP,
Dear Mr David Casa MEP,
Dear Mr Peter Liese MEP,
Dear EVP Frans Timmermans,

Cc Shadow rapporteurs for the Social Climate Fund
Cc Shadow rapporteurs for the revision of the European Emission Trading System

Europe is in the grip of energy price and energy security crises. Households are facing soaring
energy bills and fear the coming winter, or simply cannot afford fuel to heat their homes. At the
same time, Europe faces a climate emergency. Decades of climate inaction has meant that global
temperatures have already risen well over 1.1 degrees since the pre-industrial era, bringing with
it increased extreme weather and impacts that disproportionately harm the most vulnerable.
All of these crises are fossil fuel crises. As stated by European Commission President Ursula Von
der Leyen, compared to 2021, fossil gas prices have increased 580%. Still, many households are
dependent on fossil fuels for heating their homes and for getting to work or school. As fossil fuel
prices rise, household energy bills rise too, with a disproportionate impact, once again, on those
in the most vulnerable situations, including the poorest. The response to the energy price crisis -
and to the use of fossil fuels by Russia as a geopolitical tool - cannot lock Europe into new fossil
fuels.
Yet the blame for high energy prices is falsely laid at the door of the policies that can help end
them. Since the start of the war in Ukraine, various actors have called to suspend climate action,
considering these policies costly. But climate policy goes hand in hand with energy security and
affordability; by investing in clean, cheap and sovereign renewable energy sources, as well as
boosting energy savings, we can address all three crises at once. Calls to suspend the Emissions
Trading System (ETS), or to question the phase-out of fossil fuels that is necessary to reach EU’s
2030 and 2050 climate targets will only render our energy system more fragile, while undermining
a just transition.
The EU has the tools to address these parallel social, climate and energy security crises, but it is
failing to make the most of them. ETS revenues are higher than ever and yet analysis of revenue
use suggests that Member States are not using them to boost climate action spending [1]. The
proposal for a Social Climate Fund (SCF) is a central and vitally important pillar to build the
resilience of European citizens against future crises in the mid to long term. At the same time, the
SCF will help to drive the achievement of Europe’s social and climate goals - but only if it is big
and bold enough.

We urge the SCF trilogue negotiators to recognise the central importance of the SCF for
EU social, climate and energy security goals. They should ensure that the SCF enters into
force as soon as possible, with an ambitious and resilient budget.

This means:

• Retaining the Council of the EU’s proposal to enable contributions from the auctioning of allowances under the existing ETS to support the SCF budget - the ETS should ensure an essential stream of revenues for the SCF which should be topped up by other sources of finance.

• Rejecting a fixed and capped SCF budget:
  • Revenue from auctioning existing ETS allowances should ensure a minimumbudget for the SCF, which can be topped up with other sources of finance.
  • Likewise,the SCF budget should scale in line with the carbon price, such that households receive proportionate help and in order to support investments that can help lower their exposure to such a price when they need it most. The right to clean and affordable energy must be protected and vulnerable households must be supported to make the necessary investments that will help both decarbonise the transport and building sectors and lower their bills.

• Setting the minimum SCF budget at least to the level proposed by the European Commission (€72.2 billion over 8 years).

• Complementing the budget with Member State co-financing.

• Boosting the budget further with solidarity contributions or funds derived from revenue caps on the industries reaping unexpected windfall profits generated by current high energy prices, or from auctioning allowances that would otherwise be given out for free.

Ambitious social measures are needed to support vulnerable households and affected workers in
order to ensure a just transition that is in line with the European Pillar of Social Rights. Climate
change is already harming people’s health and living conditions. If nothing is done to mitigate it,
its impacts will heavily burden future generations. Taking climate action requires ensuring
pollution isn’t free and the polluter pays principle is applied throughout the EU’ economy in a
socially fair manner.
Now is the moment that co-legislators must send a clear signal that they stand by Europe’s
citizens as they seek to address the parallel challenges to achieve energy security, tackle rising
energy prices and energy poverty, and to meet the EU’s climate commitments. Underlining and
committing to a transformative, adequately resourced SCF is central to that.

We thank you for your consideration and remain at your disposal for further exchange on this
issue.
Yours sincerely,

[1] ETS revenues totalled roughly €25 billion in 2021. Yet Member States regularly fail to spend even half of
this annual revenue on climate action. This has happened to over half EU countries between 2013-2021, according to WWF analysis. Moreover, it is doubtful whether reported ETS revenue used for climate
action is additional to national budget spending.